The 7th Word of God to not commit adultery is often and mistakenly interpreted as a sweeping statement about sexual morality.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church is an extreme example testifying to this.
In addition to adultery, they use the 7th Word of God to forbid masturbation, pornography, prostitution, rape, homosexuality, contraception, artificial insemination, divorce, polygamy and incest.
While it is true that some of these things are condemned by God, some of these so-called “offenses” are actually sanctioned such as polygamy and divorce.
However, where the church and most people go wrong is in not understanding that the scope of this 7th commandment is actually very narrow.
It is NOT a general prohibition of sexual activity outside of marriage.
The New Testament Greek word for “adultery” is MOICHOS.
And in order to fully comprehend what God means when He uses this word, it must be understood in its Old Testament Hebrew sense.
The truth is and this may seem unseemly to some is that during Biblical times, adultery was considered ONLY a female crime and sin.
Men were NOT subject to it.
Understand that the Decalogue or these 10 Words of God were addressed to Israelite men.
The truth is this commandment was just as much about the property rights of men as it was in protecting the sanctity of the sexual relationship between a man and his wife or wives.
According to Biblical law, a “wife” and a “fiancee” were pretty much one and the same.
In other words, a “fiancee” was a woman over whom legal possession had been transferred from her father to her husband-to-be.
So if a man had sex with a woman who was betrothed to another man, this violated the EXCLUSIVE sexual rights that her husband (or husband-to-be) had over the woman.
In my last post, I went over the spiritual meaning and implications of adultery but here we can see God’s wisdom working itself out through this commandment in a very practical way as well.
Adultery had severe social consequences, especially with regards to paternity and inheritance.
The truth is other than the prohibition against a man having sex with another man’s wife, this commandment simply does not address other types of sexual activity by males.
Probably one of the biggest points which would differ from the modern Western understanding (actually maybe only Western), is that if a married man had sex with an unmarried woman, it was NOT considered adultery.
Yeah, you read that right.
If a married man had sex with an unmarried woman, it was NOT considered adultery.
I actually picked up a few interesting quotes from a couple of female members of a Bible forum talking about this very topic.
“As offensive as it is to our sensibilities these days, the bible does not describe an unmarried woman with a married man as adultery. She either becomes a second wife, or she is a prostitute (if he paid for it) or she is his concubine. Only if the *woman* is married, is it called adultery. I don’t like it any more than you do, but that’s what it says.”
“As mentioned, the intention of God was one man and one woman for a marriage. Abraham had Hagar, Jacob had Leah, Rachel, Bilha and Zilpah. None of these were called adultery or sin. But, of course they turned out badly, too. That’s all I’m saying. I don’t condone “shacking up”; I don’t condone polygamy. But the bible doesn’t specifically forbid it.”
“And yes, as far as I know, no one on this group promotes polygamy or concubines. We all understand it is NOT YHVH’s perfect will. Which is one man, one woman. I will state again, our western minds sometimes shy back from things we don’t culturally and historically understand, but none the less, they are in there, and it says what it says. But again…just because something is ‘allowed’, does not mean we have to, or that we should.”
In protest, some may ask what about the prohibition in the Bible against having sex with an unmarried and unengaged virgin?
Again, in the narrow legal sense of this commandment, this was not adultery but a violation of a father’s property rights rather than a husband’s.
The penalty in this case is that the man had to marry the woman or pay a fine.
“But if her father refuses to give her to him, he must pay a sum equivalent to the bride-price for virgins.”-Exodus 22:16
Another sexual act that is not covered by this 7th Word of God is prostitution.
Don’t get me wrong.
The Bible definitely discourages prostitution but it’s not what we’re dealing with here.
For example, the following proverb from the Book of Sirach, which is part of the Apocrypha/Deuterocanonical scripture makes a clear distinction between the seriousness of sleeping with a prostitute versus another man’s wife.
“A prostitute is regarded as spit,
but a married woman is a deadly tower
for those who embrace her.”
-Sirach 26: 22
The required evidence and punishments for adultery changed over time.
During the time of the Patriarchs, no proof other than the husband’s suspicions were needed, and he himself had the right to put his wife to death.
Once the Laws of Moses came into effect, the requirement for a conviction had to be a minimum of two witnesses.
However, not long after the death of Yeshua, the death penalty for the sin of adultery was removed because its practice had become so rampant that the number of women who would have to be executed had reached unthinkable numbers.
Ingrid says
I am studying the book of Luke right now and I have a question. In Luke 16:18 a verse about adultery is seemingly random, no obvious connection to the verses previous or afterwards. Do you have any insight on this? In my mind I want to connect it to divorcing the law and the prophets from the kingdom of God preached by John and Yeshua. Am I far off on this thinking?
richoka says
Hi Ingrid, I have yet to do an in-depth study on this particular verse in context. However, I do recall reading something that this was about Yeshua speaking out against the practice of men willy-nilly marrying and divorcing woman left and right just to satisfy their unlawful carnal desires. Apparently, there was a custom where a man would take a wife for a short time and then divorce her for no good reason and then pretty much the next day take in another wife. Yeshua was speaking out against this practice.
Incidentally and as you may know, I would be firmly against the notion that the law and the prophets have been or should be divorced from the kingdom of God preached by Yeshua. Yeshua Himself said, “I have NOT come to abolish the Law, but to fulfill it.”
Rav Rem says
There is no concrete evidence that polygamy is not also the perfect will of G-d.
richoka says
True.
Stephanie says
To say adultery is just a sin for a woman is not really correct. The man who slept with the married woman was stoned to death along with her, therefore he was guilty too. This distinguished Israel from the surrounding people’s who would only kill the woman on a husband’s whims as you stated occurred during the Patriarch’s era. YHVH is more merciful towards women than mankind and has placed many ordinances in place to protect us.
mike says
No, that’s not correct. You’d have to post biblical support, which i don’t think you’ll find.
KE says
Leviticus 20:10 states the man and woman shall be put to death.
Transgenderism is outlawed in Deuteronomy 22:5, which says a person shall not wear clothing of the opposite sex.
Rich says
Jesus said in the Gospels a man can commit adultery against his wife
Lionel says
2 Samuel 12
Ryan says
Mark 9:11 “He said to them, ‘Whoever divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against his wife; and if a wife divorces her husband and marries another man, she too commits adultery” –Yeshua
Don says
Dude. What Bible are you reading?
richoka says
Read all different kinds of translations.
Ryan says
Complete Jewish Bible
Ryan says
I’m not sure why I wrote Mark 9:11 but it’s actually Luke 16:18. I like Jewish translation. Our Creator trusted the Jews with writing His word. Almost every if not all authors of the biblical texts were Jewish.
JDOE says
MARK 9:11 DOESNT SAY THAT,YOU ARE A LIAR AND ADDED TO THE MOST HIGHS WORD!!
Ryan says
I’m not sure why I wrote Mark 9:11. It’s actually Luke 16:18. Sorry for the confusion. Human error
richoka says
No prob
Sol says
In cases of adultery, yes, you needed two witnesses of the ACT. Which you saw who was the man involved, and he also was to be executed, not just the woman. The Word of Elohim is fair and just, it is man that warps it to oppress others. So not just unthinkable numbers of women would be executed, but men, too. That’s why the men changed the Law, so they could get away with adultery. That’s also why polygamy was outlawed. Men knew they’d still be sleeping with other women, married or not, but they wanted to avoid all responsibility toward the woman. So a woman could make no claims against a man who was her sexual partner, even though he was married, men made it “illegal” to have more than one wife, or even a concubine. It was done to protect themselves so if a woman asked for anything to give the woman a place in his life, he could say, “Sorry, dear, I’d love to, but its against the law!”. Very clever.